| |
|
 |
|
12.
ACHARYA GIRISH JHA
Mentored by more than 50 masters in Himalayas and other parts of India, later
initiated by a legend, Himalayan mystic, master and enlightened, commonly known
as Laughing Saint of Himalayas. Learnt ancient scriptures, religions, and
practiced esoteric and spiritual practices for years. Intensive meditation and
other practices for over 20 years evolved him into master teacher, mystic, and
expert in many practices of yoga, Tantra and spirituality. Studied physics,
physiology, psychology that helped him to combine the wisdom of science with
Tantra, yoga. Conducted more than 35000 hours of teaching, training, conducting
workshops, seminars, talks to people from all walks of life. After working in
national Institute of yoga for 27 years, now working in USA since 2007 for Human
Excellence through its many very well designed, developed and tested programs
and workshops. Personal Transformation, Peace meditation, Stress Management,
Rest, relaxation and resilience, Kundalini, Tantra meditation, Corporate Stress
Management, Youth Stress management, Healthy Aging, programs and workshops have
changed the lives of many people.
His simple, easy, effective
approach to understanding the message of great
masters, texts and easy to do practices with their
rational interpretations and explanations attracts
people from all walks of life. In addition, he had
conducted research studies in meditation, asthma,
high altitude medical sickness, diabetes,
physiological correlates in meditation etc. His
message is simple – be in peace and keep smiling.
Discover within- love, energy, awareness and peace
---your essential nature. He works with you and in
you to reach to higher states of consciousness to
excel in personal, professional, social and
spiritual lives.
www.authenticyogatradition.com
|
INTERVIEW
NDM: It says on your bio that "Since the age of 15, he started learning
Buddhism and Jainism as his father used to teach secret texts to many
monks and saints in India."
Can you please tell me, what school of Buddhism was this?
Acharya Girish Jha:
My father, Late Dr K C Jha, a scholar of Sanskrit and Pali , used to
teach Buddhism and Jainism Sanskrit and Pali texts. Later he used to
bring the texts – Tipitaka and texts mostly written by Nagarjuna, the
Madhyamika school of Mahayana. When I entered into the path of yoga and
Tantra, I travelled extensively to different parts of India including
Leh, county of the Himalayan state of Jammu and Kashmir. There I learnt
Tibetan Buddhism.
Kindly get some glimpse of Leh monasteries
NDM:
Thanks,
Acharya-ji,
beautiful photos!
Do you
also teach the practice of Brahmacharya in preparation for
jnana yoga?
Shatsampat (six virtues) are
six mental practices to stabilize the mind and emotions, and to
further develop the ability to see beyond the illusions of maya.
Shama (tranquility, calmness) is the
ability to keep the mind peaceful, through moderating its reaction to
external stimuli.
Dama (restraint, control) is the
strengthening of the mind to be able to resist the control of the
senses, and the training of the senses to be used only as instruments of
the mind.
Uparati (withdrawal, renunciation) is the
abandonment of all activities that are not one’s Dharma (Duty). A simple
lifestyle is followed that contains no worldly distractions from the
spiritual path.
Titiksha (endurance, forbearance) is the
tolerance of external non-conducive situations that are commonly
considered to produce suffering, especially in extreme opposite states
(success and failure, hot and cold, pleasure and pain).
Shraddha (faith, trust) is a sense of
certainty and belief in one’s guru (teacher), the scriptures and the
yogic path.
Samadhana (focus, concentration) is the
complete one-pointedness of the mind.
Acharya Girish Jha:
by asking about ShatSamapatti , you
helped me to revive my memories with my master in Himalayas as he taught
me 100 times these six groups under Sadhana Chatusya . When I was in
India, people are ready to learn, the moment I said – learn from
Shankara. But here I guide people indirectly by explaining about mind
moving in/ outside-and many more references.
I combine the wisdoms of the old master
of yoga - Vasistha and Shankara together . Vasistha - 7 Bhumikas or
foundations
| |
Acharya Girish Jha
with Students in the Himalayas |
|
NDM: Do you teach this practice to lead to "samadhi meditation", or
what is known as the eighth and final limb in the
Yoga Sutras of Patanjali?
Acharya Girish Jha:
Yes, I do but combine wisdoms of many traditions of tantra, Jnana, Patanjali and
raja ( traditionally we understand more than 27 organs and separate from
Patanajali yoga)
NDM: It seems that the Maitri Upanishad synthesizes all
of the earlier thoughts on yoga,
tapas and
meditation and the six-fold yoga is outlined in section 6.18:
It says the precept for effecting non duality is
restraint of the breath (pranayama),
withdrawal of the senses (pratyahara),
meditation (dhyana),
concentration (dharana),
contemplation (tarka),
absorption (samadhi).
But in the Brahmasutrabhasya Sri Adi
Shankara makes three references to samadhi as a condition of
absorption but refutes the idea that
samadhi is of itself, the means for liberation, he says:
Though there is the natural
eradication of difference in
deep sleep and in samadhi etc.,
because false knowledge
has not been removed, differences
occur once again upon
waking just like before.
What are your thoughts on this? Also
how
important is the practice of Brahmacharya (celibacy) for
attaining Nirodha-Samadhi or Chitta-Vritti-Nirodha in your tradition?
Acharya Girish Jha:
Let us first know that my master used to say
the oldest text of yoga is ‘yoga- Vasistha’ written much earlier
than Patanjali yoga sutra. Majority of masters believes that the
fundamental principles of later yoga, tantra, Mahayana Buddhism,
Jainism have accepted them with little modifications. Recently, when
I was giving a talk on ‘authentic yoga tradition’ in Princeton
University, many teachers showed their ignorance about the text. It
gives details about 7 foundations of yoga but later explains and
divides them into sub parts.
Astavakra Gita says –‘withdraw your mind
within and allow it to rest within, you will be in peace and
happiness within’. I read this verse repeatedly and developed what I
call Turiya rest and relaxation program. Initially, it was 10 steps
and progressively reduced to 4 and 6 steps, taking care of the fact
that the verse above indicates – practice and non-practice
together.
Shankara explains in Aporaksha Anubhuti,
18 steps to yoga. The same we find in ‘Tejo Bindu Upanishad’ too.
These steps/limbs are
Yama, Niyama,
Renunciation (Tyaga), nonspeaking (Mauna), Place (Desha), Time (Kala),
Asana, Mulabandha, Balance of Body (Dehasamyam), Fixing
of the Gaze (Drik
Sthithi), Pranayama, Pratyahara, Dharana, Atma-Dhyana, and Samadhi.
In Dattatreya yoga
Sastra (text), I discovered another limb, termed as ‘Sanketa’ or
subtle points or indications of higher consciousness. Similarly when
I read and contemplated Upanishads, there are references of many
steps/ limbs of yoga.
I teach yoga which means ‘Sadhana’
leading to awakening to self. People approach me for a variety of
reasons, especially for mental health, wellbeing
and meditation etc. The goal of yoga
remains the same – to help, support, guide, inspire, teach and give
practices that drops, dissolves and
destroys ignorance/ sufferings. Instead
of talking to people about Samadhi, I encourage and inspire them to
practice ‘Shanti-meditation’ the
practice I designed, developed 25 years.
But I always declare that it adheres to fundamentals of authentic
yoga tradition and combines the wisdom
of Raja-yoga, tantra-yoga, Anapan sati,
and other traditional steps. Shanti meditation has five levels which
are progressive in nature and
reaches to Samadhi- meditation. The
expressions, the approach and steps appear different but they
conform to the one tradition – teachings of all
masters.
Shanti Meditation is simple, effortless,
easy that aims at moving the mind within, that is scattered outside.
There are five steps which define as
‘Dharana’ (but not concentration),
Pratyahara, Antar Yatra (a term I use from Jainism), Pratyak –
Chetna (withdraw mental state) and Anapan sati.
The practice is still a non-practicing
as the student does nothing except moving the mind consciously
within.
Based on the progress, experiences and
aspiration of students, I support them to move to Shanti-meditation
– level-2-3-4-5.
For example, at level-3, we awaken to
Samprajnata – Samadhi and Asamprajnata- Samadhi while fourth awakens
to Shakti principle and fifth
highest level.
It is not that I go by rule of the book
but go with student as a student is the most important part of the
trinity (teacher, teaching and taught).
Many a times, I share light movements
with students and ask them – how many asana you want to practice in
advancing on the path.
When I receive answers in numbers like
15 for beginners, 25-30 for intermediate and 80-100 for advanced.
I further explain then what Lord Shiva
said in Gherand Samhita, ‘there are 8.4 million asana but 84 are
important. Out of 84, only 32 and at last
only two asana – Siddhasana and
Padamasana are the most important ones. I clarify here that ‘the
practice of asana’ is different than that of ‘the
practice of physical exercises’. Yoga
asks to reduce the numbers of asana practice as one advances on the
path unlike physical exercise
where the number of practices and
duration both increases.
NDM:
Do you teach this practice to lead to "Samadhi meditation", or what
is known as the eighth and final limb in the Yoga
Sutras of Patanjali?
Acharya Girish Jha:
Yoga aims at
knowledge of self which is attained by Samadhi. As I answered above
in Shanti Meditation, and help people to move progressively from
outside to inside and from lower to higher states based on different
teachings. In Shanti Meditation-2, students awaken to
Samprajnata-Asamprajnata, one after the
other. It helps me and students also to awaken to different states
before we move further and deeper.
| |
Acharya Girish Jha
at Princeton University
|
|
| |
Acharya Girish Jha
at Princeton University
|
|
Struat Sovtosky question: Vedanta, Taoism,
Buddhism, Judeo-Christian Gnosticism, Mystical Sufism, all laud
sexual transcendence of duality and desire verified by the
transcendence of sex, from Buddha to Dalai Lama and millions of
others in India over the millenniums. Has...Modern Nondualism
created something new where sex and desire are not transcended?
Acharya Girish Jha:
If you enter into your home, you leave
what is outside. When there is a snow storm we experienced during
the last few days, we
rush inside our home and become free
from it. The goal is not to fight with the storm but move inside of
a space where the effect of the storm is
absent. This may be one of the many
meanings of transcending the so called sex. However, space inside
and outside is the same and essentially
one but outer manifestations are
different. How can I claim to have been liberated from the effect of
storm until I awaken and dwell in? But the moment
I am inside or behind the veil of storm
(sex), I realize what it means of transcending it. Energy at calm
inside and energy dictated by the
physical, unconsciousness and
unconscious nature.
Sex manifests in the body as sensations
for self-preservation but due to the energy. The same energy
manifests as enthusiasm, drives and urges at
an emotional level. The same energy
becomes physical, mental, emotional, intellectual and spiritual
energy depending on the state of the consciousness. Hence, the
question of ‘practice of brahmcharya’ is not more important than
ease of rising into higher states of the consciousness. As one
rushes
into home and discovers ‘peace and cam’
there, even without creating it. Similarly, when one awakens to that
‘space’ or ‘higher states in meditation’,
one has already transcended the ‘very
sex’, you are talking about.
My masters used to talk about it, giving
a wonderful metaphor. He used to say to all of us, ‘my son, I have
two darlings – Bhubhuksha and
Mumuksha. Bhubhuksha is a word
represents all pleasures, pains, sufferings, cravings including sex
and Mumuksha is a word represents
intense aspiration of the mind to awaken
to real-self. You have to a make a choice consciously, which one you
want to enjoy. When I am
alone, Mumuksha darling takes me to a
state where I discover there are not two but one and only one self
all around. When I allow to drop down
to Bhubhuksha, I realize the same
reality becoming many and enjoy the same state inside even when I
talk to you, him, her etc. Please don’t fight,
curse with sex or any pleasure, pay more
attention to Mumuksha to awaken, to realize and to transcend.” I
think this explains what exactly you
want to know in the question.
The problem with modern non dualism is
that is more intellectual and dry, not very much supported by the
practice. It relies more on a
rational interpretation than awakening.
Awakening comes when we go beyond ‘waking state’ that puts
reasoning’s, arguments and different interpretations. When we simply
say – we need to transcend in order to awaken to the reality, it
also means transcending the sex and desires. How can we
exclude desires and sex and still
transcend to know what reality is. I some time laugh at my own
‘intellect, mind and the arguments that appear
in the mind’ which says, “Ah, you have
transcended”. But the truth remains as long as the mind and
intellect confirms “Ah, you have transcended”-
you are not THERE.
At last, my friend, I will not classify
– modern or old non dualism as fundamental principle is transcending
and awakening and going beyond waking
state. One transcends ‘one desire’, he
transcends all. Transcending is an entry into awakened state where
nothing remains – your sex, your
desires, cravings, or even which cult,
dogma, belief or religion you belong to. For me, all are mine as
long as I am Sadhaka and nothing belongs,
the moment awakening taking place.
| |
Intensive Meditation by
Acharya Girish Jha in Ukraine |
|
NDM: What part of
the mind has the insight or get to know the Akhandakara Vritti?
Some
people say that a Akhandakara Vritti,
(the
formless, unbroken,
unlimited thought form ) doesn’t exist outside of the brain. That with the death of the
brain there is nothing more but annihilation?
No higher Self or
reality other than this flesh?
Acharya Girish Jha:
In the words of Sri Aurobindo- “life was
involved in the matter and evolved out of it. Mind was involved in
the life and evolved out of it.
” If evolution is taking place
from matter to life to mind, there is ‘something’ evolving out of
the brain, which is involved in it. Whatever name or label
one gives does not matter- self,
nothing, nothingness, real-self, Brahman or something else. What is
more important here is to know if life evolved
out of matter but both levels –matter
and life are different and works at different planes. The mind
simply cannot comprehend by arguments.
Similarly two planes of life and mind
though interconnected in the process of evolution, appears to the
mind, a difficult to comprehend. And if evolution
is continuing, this simply means,
‘something’ must evolve out of ‘mind’ that must also be different in
‘sum and substance’ than that of the mind.
How can we try or rationalize - death of
the brain is but annihilation and no higher self or reality other
than this flesh. Even we cannot claim ‘flesh’ in
that state. It does not mean it is not
there. Flesh does not exist in deep sleep, does not mean it is not
there. The masters say it is consciousness we are
talking about. Awakening is a journey
from matter to highest consciousness or self. But when we are
awakened, we know all lower levels of
mind-life-body-matter are merely
different manifestations of the same.
There will no more puzzle for the
science if we claim ‘death of brain’ is all. It also means, of
reverse argument that ‘seat of consciousness’ is somewhere
in the brain. And so, what we are
talking about will be reduced to just playing of thoughts and
reasoning. What masters declare that ‘self’
or ‘consciousness’ they talk about is
independent of the brain, mind, life, body and the matter. If these
are present, consciousness can manifests
itself through them working as
instruments. That is Vedanta confirms mind, intellect, ego, stuff as
‘Anatakarana” or inner instrument.
Another argument comes to the mind which
is work mentioning. If brain dies, everything dies, it simply means
‘brain’ is the ‘doer’, knower whereas
our normal day to day experiences proves
otherwise.
At present or until awakening takes
place, the brain uses the consciousness due to ignorance and after
awakening, consciousness uses the brain and
the mind. To believe that
‘consciousness’ also has to think like the mind to act, drops on its
own and hence the answer to your question.
END OF INTERVIEW
|
|
|