Q 1: Vedanta,
Taoism, Buddhism, Judeo-Christian Gnosticism, Mystical Sufism,
all laud sexual transcendence of duality and desire verified by
transcendence of sex, from Buddha to Dalai Lama and millions of
others in India over the millenniums. Has modern non-dualism
created something new where sex and desire are not transcended?
Amir Mourad:
When
it comes to so called "transcendence" – one should be careful to
combine all of the traditions together as though they all mean
the same thing by that word. For example, by "transcendence" for
the Judeo-Christian mystics, one does not mean the realization
of shunya - emptiness, which is what Buddhists have been
speaking of. The realization of emptiness, and the liberation
possible through such realization, is something of a completely
different nature. It is having direct insight into the nature of
reality beyond all mental categories – including the idea of a
Self, or some fixed nature of any kind which is separate from
the whole. That is why, even the idea of Supreme Being amongst
the Buddhists is another hallucination of the mind that is to be
abandoned - it is still the result of a mind creating things in
its own image. But by "transcendence" amongst the
Judeo-Christian mystics, they mean Union with a Supreme Being.
For the Sufi mystic," transcendence" is interpreted in the
framework of Islamic theology. It is called fana fi allah
– Extinction In Allah. The transcendence of the Sufi cannot be
separated from Islamic theology - even if it is flavored with
mystical ideas. But here - even in Sufism, we are still talking
about Allah, the Quran as the word of God, Muhammad as the
messenger of God, the long line of prophets, the hierarchy of
beings who are submissive to Allah -the angels and archangels,
and so on. So you have probably heard that very popular
statement that all paths lead towards the same Truth. That is
not really the case. Many paths lead in totally different
directions. It is also not true that all teachings are “fingers
pointing to the moon”. We need to make a distinction between
pointers and conclusions – and some of the traditions you have
mentioned have very firm conclusions about what “transcendence”
means. So we should be careful not to use the word
“transcendence” as though all traditions have the same
understanding of what that word means.
When it comes to so
called "Advaita", one thing which is important for us to
understand is that "Advaita" does not refer to any particular
method or technique. It is simply a certain outlook on the
world. The "Dvaita" traditions have said that there is a
sharp, firm division between one's own fundamental nature, and
the fundamental nature of the whole existence - hence, the
philosophy of dualism. The philosophy of dualism reflects
something completely characteristic of buddhi, the intellect.
Because that is the very nature of buddhi - to fragment,
discriminate amongst the senses and create countless divisions -
and all of the conceivable polar opposites that are possible
through these divisions. This dualistic perception may be
useful for survival in the body and practical purposes in the
world, but it is completely useless when it comes to realization
of the Unthinkable. So it was very natural for those who were
too dependent on the ways intellect to project the idea of
dualism.
The Advaita
traditions have a completely different understanding. They knew
very well that all of these apparent divisions are just the
projections of one's own mind - it is maya, part of the entire
structure of a dream world which has been misunderstood as the
reality. There is in fact no sharp division at all between the
Self (Atman) and the universal source (Brahman) - they are one
and the same. Even in this outlook - many other attitudes had
arisen in so called "Advaita" - some theistic, some atheistic,
some agnostic. Some have practiced bhakti yoga (Union through
devotion), Jnana yoga (Union through intelligence or
knowledge),Raja Yoga (Union through meditation), Karma yoga
(Union through action), Tantra Yoga (Union through
transformation of life energies) - there have been so many
different approaches to "Advaita". It is just like - somebody
can be a Christian and be a scientist. But one can be a
Christian and yet have a very unscientific approach towards
life. "Advaita" in itself does not refer to any particular
method, it's just a certain outlook on the world. But today in
the West –what was once a vast ocean of exploration in the
Advaita traditions has been forced into a small shoe-box – with
popular slogans and overused catch phrases.
There have even been schools in "Advaita" which have adopted
left-handed techniques of tantra which put to use the energy of
sex, not through celibacy, but through using the sexual
experience as a method towards self-realization. In Tantra,
there is a certain statement, "The very poison that kills
becomes the elixir of life when used by the wise". Any method is
simply a neutral mechanism when standing alone. In certain
hands, it may become poison. In certain hands, it can become
medicine. What creates the entire difference between the two is
the same difference between consciousness and unconsciousness.
So before we investigate into what has happened with modern
Advaita's approach towards sexual desire, we should first come
to the understanding, not merely as an idea that – but as an
actual fact, that if there is any problem with sexual desire, it
does not lie in the presence of sexual desire itself. How can
it? Sex is the very passageway through which man can be born in
the world. If that becomes “impure”, then certainly everything
else that stems from it must also become “impure”. Survival of
the species also becomes “impure” – the whole field of life
becomes “impure”. This way of thinking is simply the attitude
of an escapist.
"Transcendence" should not be equated with
the destruction of a thing, or some otherworldly state of being.
To transcend is simply to experience everything just as it is,
completely ordinary, without entanglement. It is not something
unique to sexual desire. The moment the mind becomes identified
with any of the objects of one’s experience, pleasant or
unpleasant, one’s clarity of vision has become blinded. Even
qualities like love, joy, and compassion can become a hindrance
if the mind becomes attached to them. A moment of either
attraction or aversion –and the whole universe is split in two.
Otherwise -lust in itself has never been a cause of suffering
for any human being. It is only that – because man is so often
ruled by his animal nature, it is very common in human
experience that lust becomes a source of ignorance. If lust
cannot be transformed into a meditative experience, then
whenever you are possessed by lust – in those moments you have
basically lost your sanity – nothing else in existence matters
except indulgence in the pleasures of the senses.
It is common sense. Out of thousands
of years of evolution, man has evolved from the other animals.
The animal nature that exists in man is in a way an ancient
inheritance. The entire programming of the body only understands
one thing - self preservation. And what does self-preservation
understand? Survival - both individual and survival of the
species. So it is not a coincidence that lust in particular has
often been such a source of much suffering for man -again, not
because of lust itself, but because it is far too easy for man
to become hypnotized by its spell. Otherwise, if lust happens
and you can simply remain as a witness without becoming
identified, what’s the problem? Without transcending sexual
desire, you have transcended it. But this will be very difficult
in the beginning if one has not yet become well-established
within oneself. So the traditional approach in the East has been
physical brahmacharya - celibacy. Celibacy also can help to
increase ojas - the vitality of the life energies of the body
and mind - and provide an enormous supply of energy that is
needed when you are involved in intensive practice. It can also
assist in sharpening the energy of one’s concentration in
sitting meditation. But, like any tool, celibacy can also
become a cause of many physical and psychological problems if
one uses it irresponsibly.
Has modern Advaita
created a situation where "lust" is not to be transcended? In
the East, all sorts of safety mechanisms were created to prevent
certain dangers from happening to disciples along the path. This
is why they always insisted on the guidance of a guru. The human
system is such a complex mechanism, that if one is meddling
around with it without the proper understanding, it can create
much damage. All sorts of physical and psychological disorders
can arise through improper understanding and practice in the
spiritual process. That is why it is tremendously important that
such teachings are transmitted only to those who are prepared to
receive them. Now, what has happened in the West - is that they
simply removed all of the safety mechanisms. Just about anybody
with enough borrowed knowledge and charisma can become a
"spiritual teacher". No inner transformation is needed at all.
And in order to make these teachings accessible to their
audience, such teachers out of their own misunderstandings have
taught a commercialized, distorted version of such teachings,
not as a skillful means, but because it will generate more
profit in the marketplace. The ego always wants a quick fix for
all of its problems - either through the pill, alcohol, sex,
money, or some other immediate pleasure. But when it comes
discipline – discipline is something which requires much
patience, trust, attention, commitment, concentration,
receptivity, and not being discouraged by whatever obstacles one
may experience along the path - all which are rare qualities in
the world. So I do not find it a coincidence that the vast
majority of Neo-Advaita teachers in the West do not provide any
methods for inner transformation, because that would not be a
quick fix. A quick fix is designed to provide comfort and
security, not bring you closer to realization of the truth of
your own being. And it is no secret that man is a creature of
habit. As part of this "quick fix" culture that has infiltrated
the spiritual marketplace, they dropped so many things which may
not be accessible to the average person. But it is not that the
ancient teachings do not need to be adapted. Unless they can be
presented in a way which is relevant for the modern man, they
have little value. But there is an enormous difference between a
skillful means provided out of the guidance of a guru, and
distortion of certain teachings out of certain greed and lust
for power. With the way that the "spiritual process" is being
transmitted in the West today - no, I cannot say that modern
advaita leads to "transcendence" of any kind but only more
suffering.
Q 2: Is this a
higher state than what Buddha and founder of advaita, Adi
Shankara, taught to monks and lay people and lived personally?"
Amir Mourad:
If
one’s silence can become disturbed by a mere sexual thought that
arises, then it must be so delicate and fragile. That is simply
not the nature of silence. Gautama Buddha and Adi Shankara are
just as human as any other human being – capable of the full
spectrum of human experience. The only difference is quite
simple – that because they have cut through the causes of
suffering and broken through the illusory shell of egotism, they
can remain “in the world yet not of the world”. To live in the
body and the mind, and yet without becoming a slave to the
processes of the body and the mind out of a deep communion and
insight into your original nature – that is the very nature of
Buddhahood. So being capable of experiencing sex without it
becoming a disturbance for one’s enlightenment is not a “higher”
state – without having sexual intercourse Gautama Buddha and
Shankara were already living in that state.. If the flame of
liberation burns within oneself – then it will continue burning
regardless of time and place, with or without sexual intercourse.
But one thing for one to keep in mind is that both Gautama
Buddha and Adi Shankara were gurus who were offering a
systematic discipline towards self-realization. When you are
offering a systematic discipline and guiding others along the
path - you need to function as a living example. It is unwise to
act in certain ways which break the precepts of the discipline,
and yet encourage the same precepts amongst your disciples. This
might create much unnecessary misunderstanding and confusion.
Gautama Buddha prescribed celibacy for
his disciples, not out of condemnation of sexual desire, but
simply as an aid along the path. His approach is completely down
to earth and practical. It reminds me of a certain story. There
are fourteen different questions that Gautama Buddha refused to
answer in his lifetime, and which came to be known as the
fourteen unanswerable questions . Most of them were metaphysical
in nature. Once, Gautama Buddha was approached by a disciple.
The disciple said, "If you cannot provide answers to these
questions, I will renounce your teachings and can no longer
remain as a disciple".
Gautama
told him, "These types of questions have very little to do with
the spirit of my teaching. It's just like a man who has been
wounded with a poison arrow, and whose friends and companions
simply seek to provide him with a surgeon. But, this man refuses
- demanding that he knows whether the one who has wounded him is
a priest, a merchant, a solider, or perhaps a farmer, whether he
is tall or short, young or old, the name of his village, what is
the shape of the bow, whether the string of the bow was made of
hemp, fiber, or bark - whether the shaft of the bow is made of
feathers - and if so, whether these feathers come from a
vulture, an owl, or perhaps a peacock. Being so hypnotized by
these types of questions, the man would eventually die while
still all of those things would remain unknown to him."
When it comes to the
possibilities of the inner territory, there is no "higher" or
"lower” state, nothing superior or inferior. What we consider
superior or inferior is simply what one values or does not
value. There are simply different qualities and depths of the
same inner universe. The ocean is vast in its depths, yet
undivided. Never at any point does the ocean think to itself –
“this depth is far greater than this depth”. And if everything
in existence is a manifestation of one and the same divine
energy – then what is the point of creating these prejudices as
to what is “higher” or “lower”? Everywhere, it becomes
impossible to escape from the inescapable – one will find
nothing but silence in all directions.
Regardless of all of
the knowledge and experience one has gathered, no matter how
profound it may be, whether a so called "master" or a "student",
one must always remain with a beginners mind. In Zen it is said,
in a beginners mind - there are always so many possibilities to
be explored. But in the mind if an expert - very few.
It is rare that in a
single human lifetime that the mind is struck with insight, but
what is even more rare is not to create obstacles out of one's
own insights. So it is a delicate, striking balance - of being
capable of carrying knowledge, of experiencing certain realms
which rarely ever enter into human perception, yet at the same
time you remain open, fresh, simple, and receptive. The moment
the mind becomes attached to knowledge, one has become dogmatic.
If one truly understands this - then these matters of whether
certain states are "higher" or "lower", "superior" or "inferior"
- become completely irrelevant.
NDM:
Where and why
did you live as a hermit?
Amir Mourad:
An apartment in the city of Montreal. It was far from any
traditional way of living as a hermit, because I was not living
in a cave, mountain, or some other environment which is isolated
from the society. I was living isolated from the society while
still living in the society. After I had left the university, I
was fortunate enough to have enough funds to support me for
several years where I could invest my energies into nothing else
except exploration into the inner sciences.
This process began, not out of the desire for wisdom or
enlightenment, or anything of that kind. It was entirely a
matter of escaping from suffering. I was living for several
years with depression combined with an overwhelming fear of
death. I began researching into various Western philosophers –
Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche,
Kierkegaard, and so on. I found that in spite of all of these
various different philosophies which had come to various
different types of conclusion – that the mere accumulation of
knowledge is not enough for human well-being. The fundamental
flaw that I had realized with Western philosophers was that
their approach was almost entirely dependent on the intellect,
which can only fragment, divide, produce countless different
theories and interpretations, seeing things from so many
different angles and perspectives. And with all of these
man-created gods and goddesses of various religions, that too
only reinforced this understanding – that all of our
interpretations of reality are just projections of one’s own
ego.
The ego seems to be a master at creating things in its own
image, and hanging onto those images desperately to provide
itself with feelings of comfort and protection. Our theories and
beliefs, rather than truly answering any questions only creates
a downward spiral of a million more questions. Once I began
researching into the biographies of several Western philosophers
– I had noticed something else which was even more stunning to
me, that there was a large difference between the theories of
these philosophers and their immediate, living experience.
Nietzsche was talking about human freedom, yet he himself had
suffered a nervous breakdown towards the end of his life. I
found the same pattern repeating itself everywhere.
From this observation, it was clear to me that any belief
system or philosophy is incapable of bringing liberation from
suffering. That is when I decided to abandon Western philosophy
– though the West had produced many intellectual giants and
geniuses. Still, it was clear that something much more is needed
for human well-being than mere philosophizing. That is when I
started looking into Eastern teachings. What struck me about the
East was an enormous contrast – because the emphasis was of a
completely different kind. Though again, they were speaking of
many different philosophical attitudes, it was always a matter
of direct perception – of inner exploration, of deepening
insight into one’s own very being through self-knowledge. Like
modern science, they had many hypothesis’. But they also were
offering methods to verify these hypothesis’, inviting you into
an experiment, a vehicle to explore the territory and come to
such discoveries through one’s own awareness. Even these
discoveries were not so important in themselves if it did not
bring well-being to man. So that is what struck me – the
emphasis was on mukta, the liberation of a human being through
inner transformation. I decided that if I was going to enter
deeper into seeing what these methods can offer, it would need a
dedicated and committed approach to exploring into these
methods. That is why I decided to become a hermit.
But still, the beginning of the experiment was only out of
desperation and fear. I just wanted to find some escape from
the sufferings that I was experiencing. That is natural for a
mind which is still driven by egotism and self-preservation, and
it is extremely rare for anybody to become involved in this
process without it first being out of much egotism. Much later
on, it evolved into something else completely.
NDM: During this period of time (6 years) were you also a
strict celibate?
Amir Mourad:
Not in the beginning. Only after perhaps the second year did I
remain celibate for most of the time. Even then, as various
transformations were happening, this need to remain physically
celibate also became less and less. It came to a point where I
knew whether there was indulgence in sexual desire or not, it
made very little difference to the silence that I had
discovered. Just as it is difficult for one who has remained
unaware of his true nature to remain silent, it just as
difficult for somebody who has discovered it not to remain
silent.
It is like a well known Zen story of two disciples who were
walking and had reached a river where they met a young,
attractive woman. Afraid of the strong current of the water, she
asked the disciples if they could carry her across. The first
disciple became nervous and hesitated, while the second very
quickly picked her up and carried her across the water to the
river bank. Settling her down, the woman thanked him and left.
As the disciples continued on their journey, the first disciple
was constantly thinking about what had just happened. He
couldn’t get that woman out of his mind. Not able to contain
himself, he expressed himself to the other disciple and said,
“Our discipline is not supposed to involve any contact with
women. Yet you carried that woman across the river!”
The second disciple said, “I set her down on the river bank long
ago, while till now you are still carrying her.”
Until one has discovered some depth of silence, it may be useful
temporarily to avoid putting yourself in situations where the
mind can become easily disturbed. That is one of the reasons
why several traditions have recommended renunciation of the
world. Unfortunately, too many were unable to understand that it
is not really the world that needs to be renounced, but the
veils of one’s own egotism and ignorance. If you are very
easily becoming entangled in your responses to certain stimuli,
just reduce the stimuli triggering the entanglement. That was
the intention of certain traditions in recommending being a
hermit or ascetic, but I do not find that this approach is
compatible with the way of life of the modern man. If
“spirituality” is to have any social relevance, it needs to be
integrated with man’s involvement in the world. The revolution
of Tantra in the East was just this – you don’t have to live as
an ascetic or a hermit. An ordinary householder can also come to
his liberation – because this is entirely about entering deeper
into your own being. Even things which are usually a hindrance
can become a stepping stone if approached with awareness. If you have severed yourself from the
chains of ignorance, what is the point of renouncing the world?
You can be “in the world but not of the world”. All of the
obstacles for enlightenment are inner obstacles, they exist
nowhere else except at the level of the mind.
When I tried to remain celibate in the beginning, I quickly
discovered how many problems were attached to it. First, it
requires enormous strengthening of the will and discipline –
both of which are rare qualities in the beginning. Second, even
if you manage to gather a certain discipline that still does not
mean that celibacy cannot be used in ways which can be damaging.
I had to discover this through much trial and error. Because
even if you remain celibate and have enormous will in
controlling the body, that still does not mean you have cut
through your attachment to sexual desire. Physical celibacy is
often misunderstood as what has been called brahmacharya. But in
fact celibacy has little to do with it. If you noticed in one of
your earlier questions when I was speaking briefly of
brahmacharya – I spoke of “physical brahmacharya”.
Brahmacharya comes from two words, Brahman and charya.
Brahman is a word which points to the Supreme Reality.
Charya means “one who moves”. One who moves and lives in a
continuous communion with the Supreme Reality is a
brahmachari. This means that you are capable of living
through the body, mind, and five senses – yet also liberated
from the body, mind, and five senses. For a brahmachari, one can
become involved in the sexual act, and yet if one remains
undisturbed and grounded in silence, still one remains a
brahmachari.
So I quickly discovered in the beginning that even if one
remains celibate – now you have an enormous storehouse of sexual
energy available to you. But even if you continue gathering this
sexual energy, without channeling it consciously in a certain
direction, the mind will become sexually repressed. An element
of mindfulness is also completely essential. That is why it is
very dangerous to try and remain celibate without channeling
this energy, and not just channeling it, but also as a conscious
process. So that popular idea is true that celibacy can lead to
sexual repression. What is little known and not often explored
is that it is also possible to remain celibate without becoming
sexually repressed.
NDM: What kind of yoga did you practice by the way?
Amir Mourad:
Tantra Yoga
(union through transformation of life energies) as preparation
for Raja Yoga (union through sitting meditation).
NDM: When you said previously,
"To live in the
body and the mind, and yet without becoming a slave to the
processes of the body and the mind out of a deep communion and
insight into your original nature – that is the very nature of
Buddhahood.
What
lives in the mind and body and what is this nature you speak of
exactly?
Amir Mourad:
Not a self,
soul, God, or “pure consciousness” – but the living presence of
the whole existence. When I say the whole existence, I mean
precisely that. The human being, like the whole universe, is
one undivided, holistic whole. One cannot cling to the so called
“absolute” while remaining blind to the so called “relative”.
Neither can one cling to the relative while remaining blind to
the absolute. Even our ideas about “Absolute” and “relative” are
again, more dualisms created by the intellect. That is how the
intellect functions – it needs to create polar opposites in
order to compare one thing to another. By necessity, if the
relative exists, the Absolute exists. If the relative
disappears, the Absolute disappears in the same breath. Even
these distinctions between the “relative” and the “Absolute” are
more projections of the mind. It can perhaps be a useful
distinction for the sake of intellectual convenience, but making
things easier for logic to digest is one thing, and the Truth is
something else completely. Everything in existence is one
continuity, in the same way that if you put your hand under a
sink of warm running water and gradually change the temperature
until it becomes cold, you will be unable to find where the
“hot” begins and the “cold” ends. The greatest delusion of the
intellect is to believe in dividing lines in existence when
there are none. When I spoke of living in the body and the mind
without becoming enslaved to their processes, I was speaking of
a certain way of being where the experience of life is no longer
revolving around egotism. It was not to suggest that there is
some fixed “thing” which is living through the body and mind.
But it is difficult to communicate without dragging the
imperfections of our language into the situation, and I am not
neurotic enough to avoid using pronouns.
If you were to try and reduce reality to some fixed “nature”
that you can grasp in your fist, whatever your perspectives are
about it, it is destined to be short-sighted. What is said here
is no exception. If one is to come into communion with Truth,
the mind must drop its attachment to knowledge and allow
something else to function. If the mind is attached to
knowledge, that is what is called dogmatism. It cannot really be
called “knowing”. But it would also be inaccurate to say that it
is “not-knowing” either. I call it “illuminated ignorance”.
A disciple once asked the master, “What is the first principle?”
The master said,” If I were to tell you, it would become the
second.”
NDM: Also can you elaborate on this part?
“So being capable of experiencing sex without it becoming a
disturbance for one’s enlightenment is not a “higher” state –
without having sexual intercourse…
How do you have sex without becoming attached to having it? Is
it possible to take drugs like heroin, or crack cocaine and not
become a drug addict if you do this every day?”
Amir Mourad:
Being
involved in the sexual experience without being blinded by
attachment is possible through a consciousness which is capable
of action, yet without desperately craving after the fruits of
one’s actions. It is simply means being able to remain as a
witness without becoming identified with what enters one’s
perception, in this case, instinct. The intelligence of instinct
is basically about self-preservation, whether it is survival of
the body, or the survival of the species. The sexual experience
may offer some pleasure, but the fundamental reason why nature
has put sexual desire into the system is for procreation. The
fact is that the world needs the sexual relationship between the
man and the woman, otherwise humanity will become extinct. So
does that mean that there is no other way to experience sex
except by becoming a slave? To be more specific, is it possible
to experience instinct without becoming identified with
instinct? Yes, through a meditative consciousness it is very
much possible. But if one has not become somewhat grounded in
being meditative, then in most cases indulgence in sexual desire
will definitely disturb one’s clarity of vision. This is one of
the reasons why in the left-handed tantric traditions which have
used sex as a method for the expansion of consciousness, these
methods were never transmitted to just about anybody. They were
always transmitted secretly from master to disciple to ensure
that those who are involved in the sexual techniques of tantra
would be grounded, responsible, and centered enough to handle
them. Otherwise, these techniques simply become an excuse for
hedonism, which will only strengthen one’s delusions, and many
times these techniques had fallen into the wrong hands and did
precisely that. So left-handed tantric techniques over time
began to build a reputation as being “immoral” and “demonic”,
when the original spirit of the science was totally different.
The fact is that if one is established in meditation, it will
become very difficult to be involved in any kind of compulsive
behavior in the first place.
NDM: you
also said,
“Gautama
Buddha and Shankara were already living in that state. If the
flame of liberation burns within oneself – then it will continue
burning regardless of time and place, with or without sexual
intercourse.”
But how do you put this flame permanently , so it
doesn’t burn anymore?
Amir Mourad:
It is true that one must not give
too much importance to impermanent, passing experience. But that
also does not mean that impermanent experience is irrelevant.
Every experience that enters into one’s perception does not
simply disappear the moment it passes. It shifts down into one’s
unconscious and gathers force there as a memory. Every memory
that one has gathered also has certain tendencies attached to it
which continue to have an influence. So depending on the nature
of the memories that one has gathered and their tendencies, the
human system will re-organize itself in various different ways.
If they are stressful, ego-centered, without much awareness or
insight, then the human system over time organizes itself in
such a way that it becomes programmed for suffering. In the same
way, by inducing insight and other dimensions of experience in
human consciousness – it is possible that over time the human
system will re-organize itself so that everything becomes a
support for remaining in a continuous state of liberation while
still living in the body. So the process has much to do, not
really with attaining any particular state, but in cutting
through the obstacles which are preventing you from discovering
your own inner wisdom. Even a glimpse into silence is a rare
happening in a single human lifetime. Before the silence of
enlightenment can become as spontaneous as one’s own blood
stream, it is not possible first without a temporary glimpse.
When the activity of the mind comes to a silence, and the
essential nature of one’s being shines forth, this is the state
of nirvikalpa Samadhi. Nirvikalpa Samadhi is not the end, but
simply a stepping stone towards Sahaja Samadhi, spontaneous
enlightenment.
END OF INTERVIEW